Comments (10)
Cynthia Reeves Keyworth wrote:
I love Lucian Freud's work so I like this -- it's fun and playful. I like Julian's new subject matter: paint tubes, pencils, etc.
I love Lucian Freud's work so I like this -- it's fun and playful. I like Julian's new subject matter: paint tubes, pencils, etc.
12.17.07
Kimberly wrote:
I will admit that I was puzzled by this painting until I read Cynthia's comment. I studied psychology in college; while I've seen Lucian's work, his is not the first name (or even the second) that comes to mind when I think of Freud. I like your "tools of the trade" paintings, Julian.
I will admit that I was puzzled by this painting until I read Cynthia's comment. I studied psychology in college; while I've seen Lucian's work, his is not the first name (or even the second) that comes to mind when I think of Freud. I like your "tools of the trade" paintings, Julian.
12.17.07
silvina wrote:
Out of curiosity I looked through my copy of 'Freud at Work' to try to find feet in that position. Must be in another of his books.
Out of curiosity I looked through my copy of 'Freud at Work' to try to find feet in that position. Must be in another of his books.
12.17.07
Peter wrote:
And for those interested, there is a large exhibition of Lucien Freud's work that just opened at the Museum of Modern Art on N.Y.C. A review can be found at nytimes.com this past Friday.
And for those interested, there is a large exhibition of Lucien Freud's work that just opened at the Museum of Modern Art on N.Y.C. A review can be found at nytimes.com this past Friday.
12.17.07
Barbara wrote:
Hi Julian and comment writers Thanks to all who enlightened me about this painting. I was just in Paris where many of the exhibitions that I saw had pieces referrring to the process of the artist. This is my scholarly interest so I am delighted whenever I learn something about it. Happy Holidays to all. Barbara
Hi Julian and comment writers Thanks to all who enlightened me about this painting. I was just in Paris where many of the exhibitions that I saw had pieces referrring to the process of the artist. This is my scholarly interest so I am delighted whenever I learn something about it. Happy Holidays to all. Barbara
12.17.07
Janice C Cartier wrote:
Julien,
Another new romp! I like it a lot. I have been looking at Freud since last week when a friend sent me head's up on his MOMA show...stunning playfulness in the paint both yours and Lucien's and for me a delightful discovery of a thrilling landscape on the Charlie Rose interview...bravo..and many merci's.
All best,
Jan
Julien,
Another new romp! I like it a lot. I have been looking at Freud since last week when a friend sent me head's up on his MOMA show...stunning playfulness in the paint both yours and Lucien's and for me a delightful discovery of a thrilling landscape on the Charlie Rose interview...bravo..and many merci's.
All best,
Jan
12.17.07
silvina wrote:
I just finished watching the Charlie Rose interview. I see what you mean by annoying. It was quite obvious that Mr. Rose is completely unfamiliar with fine art. He seemed bewildered by Freud's "fascination with nudes". The questions were pathetic. In my opinion, Richardson was the only one worth listening to. Despite all the negatives, this was an interesting interview. Thanks for posting the link.
I just finished watching the Charlie Rose interview. I see what you mean by annoying. It was quite obvious that Mr. Rose is completely unfamiliar with fine art. He seemed bewildered by Freud's "fascination with nudes". The questions were pathetic. In my opinion, Richardson was the only one worth listening to. Despite all the negatives, this was an interesting interview. Thanks for posting the link.
12.17.07
Leave a comment